What Role for Science in Swiss Democracy and Worldwide?
In Switzerland, science enjoys greater public trust than the police, government or parliament. But what exactly is the role of science in a democracy, and how does it differ in dictatorships?
Send us a link
In Switzerland, science enjoys greater public trust than the police, government or parliament. But what exactly is the role of science in a democracy, and how does it differ in dictatorships?
Over the summer, Greenland’s two largest research institutions, the Greenland Institute of Natural Resources and the University of Greenland, both announced policies of not starting new research projects with US researchers.
This article argues that science communication is not just dissemination but part of participatory knowledge production, especially when science is socially contested and policy-relevant.
Climate policy support varied more across cultural worldviews than biodiversity policy support, according to a survey in Japan.
A new study identifies five audience 'classes' based on people's perceptions of scientists’ credibility
Institutional science communication has become a central tool for addressing the challenges of disinformation and strengthening public trust in public institutions.
Science's credibility issues stem from the deliberate manipulation of research designs and model specifications.
If more research is openly available than ever before, and open is framed as a way to build trust, why isn't public trust in science at an all-time high?
Debates on contested emerging technologies illustrate how publics make sense of science and technology by making unexpected connections between scientific insights, values, hopes and fears.
New research from the University of Southampton has found that trust in representative institutions, such as parliaments, governments and political parties, has been declining in democratic countries around the world.
In what is considered the most comprehensive post-pandemic survey of trust in scientists, researchers have found a majority of people around the world carry widespread trust in scientists.
Public communication on controversial issues has meant that science is more relevant than ever before. At the same time, it has made researchers vulnerable to attacks that undermine their credibility.