Diamond Open Access, Societies and Mission
In this article Robert Harington assesses the Diamond open access model for society journal publishing.
Send us a link
In this article Robert Harington assesses the Diamond open access model for society journal publishing.
A new book by actor Alan Alda is all about communication — and miscommunication — between doctors, scientists and civilians.
Private firm says its watchlist of untrustworthy journals will be objective and transparent — but not free.
We’re moving the online journal forward, and we hope you’ll join us on our journey.
Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions.
This feature enables users to update the record’s files after they have been made public and researchers to easily cite either specific versions of a record or to cite, via a top-level DOI, all the versions of a record.
Nature will publish more details on experiments described in life-sciences papers.
Thousands of open access papers have mistakenly asked readers to pay access fees, but publishers are correcting the errors.
Race-blind reviews very difficult and may not help, researchers say
A few years back, scientists at the biotechnology company Amgen set out to replicate 53 landmark studies that argued for new approaches to treat cancers using both existing and new molecules. They were able to replicate the findings of the original research only 11 percent of the time.
Is citation manipulation a moral problem or an accounting problem?
The right approach and a little extra effort will help improve your scientific literacy.
Papers with female first authors receive 10% fewer citations than comparable work published by men, according to a new study
The time that you’re absolutely sick of saying it is about the time that your target audience has heard it for the first time.
Partly in response to the so-called 'reproducibility crisis' in science, researchers are embracing a set of practices that aim to make the whole endeavor more transparent, more reliable – and better.
Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions.
Libraries can survive these times of technological upheaval, but they’re going to have to change–and fast.
Containerization technology takes the hassle out of setting up software and can boost the reproducibility of data-driven research.
Artificial intelligence is outperforming the human sort in a growing range of fields – but how do we make sure it behaves morally?
May 28-31, 2017, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
They act as a “social vaccine” that protects female students against negative stereotypes and gives them a sense of belonging.
Good looking, sociable people don’t make good scientists, according to popular stereotypes.
Supporting the development of new models for open research data in the digital age.
Learned societies used to be seen as the guardians of academic prestige. They should act on that moral authority and reclaim their oversight of peer review, says Aileen Fyfe