Open Up: A Survey on Open and Non-anonymized Peer Reviewing
A case study discussing and analysing the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review.

Send us a link
A case study discussing and analysing the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review.
Much of the debate on Plan S seems to concentrate on how to make toll access journals open access, taking for granted that existing open access journals are Plan S compliant. We suspected this was not so, and set out to explore this using DOAJ's journal metadata. We conclude that an overwhelmingly large majority of open access journals are not Plan S compliant, and that it is small HSS publishers not charging APCs that are least compliant and will face major challenges with becoming compliant. Plan S need to give special considerations to smaller publishers and/or non-APC-based journals.
Science is endangered by statistical misunderstanding, and by university presidents and research funders who impose perverse incentives on scientists.
Thoughts and reflections on the role that open research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university.
A dataset that is the result of content mining 167,318 published psychology articles for statistical test results.