It is the universality of science, coupled with a love for knowledge and understanding shared by all humanity, that gives science its power to transcend cultural and other differences. By Fabiola Gianotti, Director General, CERN.

In his fantastic Peters Memorial Lecture on occasion of receiving CNI’s Paul Evan Peters award, Herbert Van de Sompel of Los Alamos National Laboratory described my calls to drop subscription.

Scientists in New Zealand held the first ‘Kindness in Science’ workshop in December 2017 at the University of Auckland, hoping to kick-start a movement that will offer a kinder, gentler and more inclusive scientific culture. The group’s mantra is “Everyone here is smart and kind — don’t distinguish yourself by being otherwise.”

When rewards such as funding of grants or publication in prestigious journals emphasize novelty at the expense of testing previously published results, science risks developing cracks in its foundation.

It's easy (and right) to criticize Trump for his vulgar dismissal of developing countries, but scientists harbor their own prejudice.

Sexual harassment is draining. It takes up time and energy, and it does not result in anything for one's CV or annual review. It is a productivity tax on women.

The leaders of Elsevier have now decided that the epoch of journals will soon be over, argues the former editor of the BMJ.

Neil Jacobs, head of scholarly communications support at Jisc, explains the significance of the recent Horizon 2020 open publication announcement.

More EU ministers and commissioners are voicing support for bigger research and innovation funding - but the political argument is a long way from won. To win the case for more funding, innovation fans are going to have to talk, not abstractly, but concretely.​

The use of outdated computational tools is a major offender in science’s reproducibility crisis-and there’s growing momentum to avoid it.

"Truly open scholarship also requires that bibliographic references be freely available for analysis and reuse", says David Shotton, co-director of OpenCitations.

Elsevier is often thought to be the enemy of academic libraries, but in fact its practices improve libraries and lower costs.

Research impact is often talked about, but how clear is it what this term really means? The authors highlight four core elements that comprise most research impact definitions and propose a new conceptualisation of research impact relevant to health policy.

There is a serious lack in sharing material/resources that are used to creating the building-blocks of a research experiment.

Democracy depends on citizens having knowledge and being a part of the environmental decision making process - being shut out results in growing gaps between those who are protected and those who are not.

More than just an academic problem: on the repercussions of scienctific misconduct on the careers of honest and hard-working scientists.

Moon missions, ancient genomes and a publishing showdown are set to shape research.

Tips for grad students: the options for communicating your research beyond the dissertation or journal article are nearly endless and range from video games to comic books, but two of the easiest to work with are podcasts and infographics.

Efforts to engage life science companies in open innovation have been hampered by the industry’s continued reticence to share. The result is shrinking pipelines, a wave of drug patent expirations ending in sudden drops in revenue, and poorly served public health.

The Neuroskeptic commentary on a new paper by Chris Drummond about the ‘reproducibility movement’. Assuming that what really matters is the testability of a given hypothesis, how fundamental is reproducibility to science?

Rogier Creemers advises early career academics to be ruthless and put themselves first to move up the ladder.

Ultimately, the power to enforce change resides in the hands of scientists.

There is no shortage of problems facing humankind. What role science has in tackling them has long been debated.

In 2018, can we make science great again?

The preoccupation with journal IF is generated by the scientists comprising the review committees responsible for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.

There have been two distinct responses to the replication crisis – by instituting measures like registered reports and by making data openly available. But another group continues to remain in denial.

The goal is to customize treatments for cancer and other diseases to a patient's own biology. But something as simple as failing to take care of tissue samples en route to the lab can derail that.

Lucy Patterson reports back from Science Hack Day Berlin.

Initiatives are in place to keep early-career investigators in the biomedical system, but more support is needed.

A 30 page paper panning the Commission’s copyright plans on press publishers written by JRC never saw the light of the day.