Comedy As a Tool to Demystify Science
If scientists want people to take science seriously, comedy may be the key.
web articles
Send us a link
If scientists want people to take science seriously, comedy may be the key.
Vaughan Turekian, the director of the Policy and Global Affairs Division of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in the US, discusses efforts to support Ukrainian scientists and why such efforts are important for the future of Ukraine.
Japan’s contribution to world-class research continues to decline, despite having one of the world’s largest research communities, according to a report by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
Open data practices are largely conceived and managed in ways that support quantitative, rather than qualitative data. Susie Weller outlines how an ethics of care is essential to making open qualitative data practical and ethical.
A special member state task force set up to help shape framework programme 10 (FP10), has compiled the first draft. The documents set out in broad strokes the ideas for FP10, including a call for the EU to be a global research and innovation powerhouse by 2034.
Keju, China's incredibly difficult civil service test, strengthened the state at the cost of freedom and creativity.
Align commitments with the assumptions and criteria of the science based 1.5°C scenarios
How much do the views of scientists and experts count when it comes to securing public support for traffic restrictions?
It is vital that scientists engage in discussions about open access because publishing is rapidly changing, and at the moment, there are no certain outcomes in the long run.
A decade ago, University of Virginia psychology professor Brian Nosek cofounded an unusual nonprofit, the Center for Open Science. It’s been a cheerleader, enabler, and nagger to convince scientists that making their methods, data, and papers available to others makes for better science.
Peer review is, at heart, a process of validation - but how do you learn to peer review?