Built on trust
Written agreements between parties in research collaborations are not a sign of a lack of faith.
Send us a link
Written agreements between parties in research collaborations are not a sign of a lack of faith.
At first glance the patriarchy appears to be thriving. Yet there is plenty of cause for concern. Men cluster at the bottom as well as the top.
Wikidata is a new step forward in the democratisation of access to information.
Interview with Dr. Michael Lauer on peer review of NIH grant applications and how it can be improved.
New kinds of dogs, goats and monkeys are being made quickly, although scientists voice worries about ethics and whether the methods should be used on humans.
Giving staff and students a say in how institutions are run would strengthen governance and clip the wings of administrators.
The small but focused snapshot of research afforded by the Nature Index helps fine-tune analysis of global scientific collaboration.
Whether and how gender affects the selection of reviewers.
An empirically-informed conceptual model to explain co-author crediting outcomes.
Lesser-known and junior colleagues helped the great physicist to piece together his general theory of relativity, explain Michel Janssen and Jürgen Renn.
The International Council for Science announced Thursday the addition of a "Seek Funding" step to the scientific method.
Numbers on racial bias in research grants awarded by the NIH show that science has more to learn about inclusiveness.
NIH director Francis Collins announced that the 50 NIH-owned animals that remain available for research will be sent to sanctuaries.
Researchers leave their labs to call for greater public support of research.
Computer scientist Torsten Hoefler is the winner of this year’s Latsis Prize.
The richest awards in science were handed out Sunday night when the Breakthrough Prize organization presented a total of $21.9 million to physicists, mathematicians, life scientists and one talented high school student.
Nosek et al. found that compared to simply asking experts to predict the likelihood that studies will be reproduced, asking them to bet money on the outcomes improved the accuracy of the guesses.
Unique companies invest early and often to develop technology from the ivory tower.
The use of journal impacts in evaluating individuals has its inherent dangers. In an ideal world, evaluators would read each article and make personal judgments.
The Eurosceptics say universities would be unaffected, or even improved, by a Brexit. They are wrong, says this vice-chancellor.
Over the past nine years, Canada has been a pretty dreary place for scientists.
Social media is shaking up how scientists talk about gender issues.
Michael Specter on CRISPR, a new technology that enables us to manipulate our genetic code with unprecedented ease, and which may lead to new cancer treatments.
Though there are currently no mechanisms in place to quickly identify findings that are unlikely to replicate, this paper shows that prediction markets are well suited to bridge this gap.
85% of German scientists use Wikipedia (30% at least daily), 5% contribute to it. (In German.)
Single-observation, story-free, triple-blinded peer-review publication model aims to be the next-generation science journal.
The outgoing head of CERN is among a group of seven researchers who will form a panel to provide independent scientific advice to the European Commission.