Be part of the European Commission Expert Group on Open Science!
Be part of the European Commission Expert Group on Open Science! - Digital Economy & Society
Send us a link
Be part of the European Commission Expert Group on Open Science! - Digital Economy & Society
New rules could stop state-funded scientists advising ministers and make it easier for companies and campaign groups to sway government decisions
Video, podcast and summary.
Webcasts of the 2016 Science|Business Horizon2020 conference: will its overall, annual budget be cut in this year's EU funding review?
A not-for-profit organisation whose activities, assets and profits are dedicated to the purpose of providing benefit to the scientific community.
ScienceTake 100th video: trying to offer compelling imagery, a glimpse at how science is done and answers to questions that are rarely asked.
ASAPbio meeting discusses the ins and outs of posting work online before peer review.
Paper underscores the limitations of peer review as a means of assessing grant applications in an era when typical success rates are often as low as about 10% in the US.
Moves to speed up the release of Zika virus research in response to the public health crisis highlight a systemic failure in scientific publishing.
Anders Hamsten, has resigned after acknowledging that he mishandled the prestigious Swedish institute's investigation into controversial surgeon Paolo Macchiarini.
How to do great research, get it published, and improve health outcomes.
The gravitational waves theorist saw physics as no one else did, but if he was around today his time would be spent chasing grants or tenures.
PhD holders should not underestimate their value to industry and the business sector.
The success rate of discoveries would be improved if we could find out how to innovate.
How Sci-Hub breaks the paywall and how did academic journals get so expensive?
A data-driven theoretical investigation of editorial workflows.
Paper showing that doubling the word frequency of an average abstract increases citations by 0.70% and that journals which publish papers whose abstracts are shorter and contain more frequently used words receive slightly more citations per paper.
An intelligent machine learning framework for scientific evaluation of researchers may help decision makers to better allocate the available funding to the distinguished scientists through providing fair comparative results, regardless of the career age of the researchers.
Independent advice from Professor Adam Tickell on open access to research publications.
This paper shows how bibliometric assessment can be implemented at individual level.
To promote and reward collaboration we’re developing a “C-score” that measures the quality and quantity of collaborators’ contributions to group efforts.,
Times Higher Education's poll shows that the bulk of staff find their work rewarding but there is a deep gulf between academics and professional and support staff.
After getting shut down late last year, a website that allows free access to paywalled academic papers has sprung back up in a shadowy corner of the Internet.
Scientists are becoming increasingly frustrated by the time it takes to publish a paper.
High-profile physicist says his students' papers were wrongly rejected by the preprint server's volunteer moderators.
20 funding organizations and public funding agencies from 11 countries promise that they will require grantees to have plans in place for sharing their results and data ASAP.
Many research advocates worry that the proposal could backfire in the face of political opposition.
The widening scandal surrounding surgeon Paolo Macchiarini and his employment at the Karolinska Insitute in Stockholm has prompted Urban Lendahl, secretary general of the Nobel Assembly, to resign.