Text Mining of 15 Million Full-Text Scientific Articles
An analysis of 15 million English scientific full-text articles published during the period 1823-2016.
Send us a link
An analysis of 15 million English scientific full-text articles published during the period 1823-2016.
Openness requires trust in close peers, but not necessarily in research community or society at large.
Open access looks set to shake up the humanities and social sciences book landscape for the better.
Humanity might have saved itself a lot of trouble in the long run by investing in the Einstein-Szilard approach to cooling water with fire.
A number of so-called scientific journals have accepted a Star Wars-themed spoof paper.
Bill Radke talks to Paul Basken, science policy reporter for the Chronicle of Higher Education, about how we should consume news that reports on scientific research.
The issue regarding free access to academic journals and content is growing increasingly contentious, with founders of sites that enable this facing the might of the law. But should knowledge be exclusive?
The European Commission has offered funding for an internet for research data. But it’s unclear what it expects to get for its money.
F1000 is reducing the open access publishing charges for all articles containing an interactive Plotly figure by 50%.
A small change would open up a whole new class of works for which publishers could demand payment for the use of small snippets, apparently including works that the author had released under an open access license.
From an audio version of a peer-reviewed journal to 60-second crash courses, these are the best science podcasts.
Examining the functionality of a range of social Web platforms, and comparing these with the traits underlying a viable peer review system.
Experts debate how best to point researchers to reputable publishers and steer them away from predatory ones.
A new study from Oxford University Press further documents the decline of reference resources, a category of scholarly material more than ready for an innovative era in its evolution.
Authors will have the opportunity to submit their manuscripts directly for consideration to Science.
Spanish researchers are still waiting for the full implementation of a law which was approved six years ago.
On awarding research funds on the basis of a modified lottery in which peer review is used to identify the most meritorious proposals, from which funded applications are selected by lottery.
Recent announcements from the creator of Sci-Hub raise the distinct possibility that Scholarly Publishers have been systematically compromised.
Science is endangered by statistical misunderstanding, and by university presidents and research funders who impose perverse incentives on scientists.