Put Gender Experts on Evaluation Panels, Commission Told
A European Commission working group recommends Horizon 2020 evaluation process to account for gender issues.
Send us a link
A European Commission working group recommends Horizon 2020 evaluation process to account for gender issues.
Brian C. Martinson imagines how rationing the number of publications a scientist could put out might improve the scientific literature.
Last week's Transforming Research conference in Baltimore, MD, gathered a range of speakers across the academic and professional spectrum.
Artificial-intelligence program AlphaGo Zero trained in just days, without any human input.
Increased provision of information in accessible repositories appears to be a cost-effective way to advance science. Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial.
In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers are on arXiv.
SpringerNature, the publisher of science magazines Nature and Scientific American, is preparing a 2018 stock market listing valuing the company at up to 4 billion euros.
An open document that tries to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Science movement currently stands.
My PhD thesis research was a dead end, but that’s why it was important.
New simulation study says peer review is better at assuring quality research than random publication choices, but some systems of review are significantly better than others. Editors seen as more effective than peer-review panels alone.
3 case studies that highlight the challenges surrounding decisions about how––and how best––to make things open.
Everybody talks about Blockchain these days, but why should we consider this technology when thinking about Open Scholarship?
Journal editors are more likely to reject papers when they experience trouble recruiting reviewers, reports a new study.
A "completely confusing statement" in a gazette notification has scientists wondering which of their papers will and won't be considered towards their promotions in the future.
DFG approved the funding of 17 high-performance electron microscopes with a total sum of €43 million. Funding for seven microscopes, amounting to €24 million, was awarded in the spring.
Philanthropy’s no replacement for crucial government science funding, but that message can get lost amid the high-profile gifts. Some science funders are now backing a push to protect federal funding.
Staid and conformist, science risks losing its creative spark. Does it need more mavericks, or are they part of the problem?
Unsurprisingly, many — if not most — scientists aren’t great at science communication.
An article considering both the efficacy and ethics of piracy, placing ‘guerrilla open access’ within a longer history of piracy and access to knowledge.
Fraudulent research and faked peer reviews have led to a humiliating setback for China's goal of becoming a global leader in scientific research.
Evolutionary differences blamed for squeezing out female researchers.
The philosophy behind the Registered Report format is that the intrinsic value of science is in the rigor of the method, not the appeal of the results.
AI is only loosely modeled on the brain. So what if you wanted to do it right? You’d need to do what has been impossible until now: map what actually happens in neurons and nerve fibers.
This first-of-a-kind report from Knowledge Exchange maps the landscape for Open Access books in the Knowledge Exchange countries; Finland, Netherlands, UK, France, Denmark and Germany, together with Norway and Austria.
Professors and aspiring professors are complicit in perpetuating a rigged system.
Cost-neutral extension of the existing Springer contracts by one year.