Is The Academic Publishing Industry Ripe For Disruption?
Taxpayers sometimes have to pay three times for any scientific article.
Send us a link
Taxpayers sometimes have to pay three times for any scientific article.
100+ volunteers sharing their knowledge about Open Science and contributing to what they see as an extremely important issue in nowadays and future science.
In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers are on arXiv.
SpringerNature, the publisher of science magazines Nature and Scientific American, is preparing a 2018 stock market listing valuing the company at up to 4 billion euros.
An open document that tries to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Science movement currently stands.
A new study highlights the variety of productivity trajectories among faculty members in computer science.
US-registered Central European University faces another year of uncertainty over whether it can continue to operate in Hungary.
80% of faculty exhibit a rich diversity of productivity patterns.
Accounting for audience gender ratio, men asked 1.8 questions for each question asked by a woman.
Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.
Why Greek and Latin medical terminology is better off dead.
Global comparisons of previous social and economic upheavals suggest that what is to come depends on where you are now, argues Robert C. Allen.
If you’re a researcher writing software, this guide will show you how to make the work you share on GitHub citable.
A European Commission working group recommends Horizon 2020 evaluation process to account for gender issues.
Brian C. Martinson imagines how rationing the number of publications a scientist could put out might improve the scientific literature.
Last week's Transforming Research conference in Baltimore, MD, gathered a range of speakers across the academic and professional spectrum.
Artificial-intelligence program AlphaGo Zero trained in just days, without any human input.
Increased provision of information in accessible repositories appears to be a cost-effective way to advance science. Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial.
My PhD thesis research was a dead end, but that’s why it was important.
New simulation study says peer review is better at assuring quality research than random publication choices, but some systems of review are significantly better than others. Editors seen as more effective than peer-review panels alone.
3 case studies that highlight the challenges surrounding decisions about how––and how best––to make things open.