After years of budget and political pressure, some climate scientists are changing the way they describe their research, and avoiding the term "climate change."

Technology could be used to wipe out malaria carrying mosquitos or other pests but UN experts say fears over possible military uses and unintended consequences strengthen case for a ban.

NIH recommendations to identify credible journals.

The National Academy of Sciences called on the federal government to make drastic policy changes to bring down the cost of prescription medicines.

Short-term visits are nixed for now, as Trump administration policies cool off U.S.-Cuba science relations

Congress has given government scientists working at U.S. defense laboratories an opportunity for a much bigger payoff—up to $500,000 per year—if their research is a commercial success.

A US Research Integrity Advisory Board is long overdue. Such a leadership body would mitigate bad practices and strengthen good research.

The president won't meet this year's American laureates, no surprise for "a very intelligent person"€ with no need for science.

With nudge from federal regulators, an internal investigation found big problems.

Our tax burden could increase by tens of thousands of dollars, based on money we don’t even make.

More members of Congress ask agency why program lapsed.

Adding to PhD students’ woes will undermine US research and economy.

Declining outputs in California, Massachusetts, New York and Maryland have made the biggest dent in US science.

Scientists fear a crackdown on embryo research if President Trump pays attention to scientific advances.

Republican-controlled Congress ordered destruction of vital sea-ice probe.

The planned overhaul would place new tax burdens on colleges and students, and some critics argue that it could undermine charitable giving to the institutions.

W. M. Keck Observatory chief scientist to lead investments in astronomy, chemistry, physics, materials science and mathematics research.

Rand Paul wants to add two people to every federal peer-review panel evaluating research proposals, charged with looking for value to taxpayers. Science advocates say idea would politicize federal funding of research.

Analysis of universities' salary data suggests major disparities in pay for early-career researchers.

House Republican says cap on indirect costs would be unreasonable and ultimately destructive.

Top White House science job stays empty more than nine months after president took office.