Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Seven Things Every Researcher Should Know About Scholarly Publishing

Seven Things Every Researcher Should Know About Scholarly Publishing

After many and long conversations among colleagues within and beyond the Scholarly Kitchen about what researchers need to know about scholarly publishing.

The Downside of Scale for Journal Publishers: Quality Control and Filtration

The Downside of Scale for Journal Publishers: Quality Control and Filtration

Scale can be achieved by broadly outsourcing the editorial process. Does this lead to a loss in quality control, and is this acceptable?

Do academy members publish better papers?

Do academy members publish better papers?

As an institution, science is not fond of privilege. Success in science is supposed to be the result of merit - hard work, tenacity and, to some degree, sheer luck - not nepotism, favoritism, or entitlement.

Altmetric's top 100: what does it all mean?

Altmetric's top 100: what does it all mean?

The top 100 list of Altmetrics is fascinating for what it tells us about communication between scientists, the attention paid to science by the general public, and also for what it tells us about altmetrics themselves.

Aging Researchers and Funding Trends

Aging Researchers and Funding Trends

The proportion of federal research funding going to investigators older than 65 was greater than that going to researchers younger than 35, even if most Nobel recipients made their discoveries before they were 40 years old.

On the changing role of the Postdoc and why publishers should care

On the changing role of the Postdoc and why publishers should care

It seems that if there’s a market that we ought to be thinking about, it’s postdocs. Guest Post by Phill Jones, Head of Publisher Outreach for Digital Science.