publications

Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Application of Theories of the Policy Process in Research on Consumption of Sustainable Diets: a Systematic Review - BMC Public Health

Application of Theories of the Policy Process in Research on Consumption of Sustainable Diets: a Systematic Review - BMC Public Health

There is a significant global lack of policy action on consumption of sustainable diets. Application of political science theories such as theories of the policy process can help in understanding policy inaction. Applying these theories could provide a more in-depth understanding of how various influences on the policy process shape decision making for consumption of sustainable diet policy.

Public Use and Public Funding of Science

Public Use and Public Funding of Science

Studying production, funding and consumption of science, a study reveals a strong alignment between what the public consumes and what is impactful, as well as an alignment between funding and collective public use.

Scrutinizing the Collaboration Criterion in Research: How Do Policy Ambitions Play out in Proposals and Assessments?

Scrutinizing the Collaboration Criterion in Research: How Do Policy Ambitions Play out in Proposals and Assessments?

This study aimed to reveal how researchers describe the collaboration with partners outside the university in research proposals.

Pollution Severity-regulated Effects of Roof Strategies on China's Winter

Pollution Severity-regulated Effects of Roof Strategies on China's Winter

Urbanization took place rapidly over recent decades and is expected to continue in the future, producing a series of environmental issues, including heat stress.

A Call for Citizen Science in Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Beyond Data Collection

A Call for Citizen Science in Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Beyond Data Collection

The COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the need to partner with the community in pandemic preparedness and response in order to enable trust-building among stakeholders, which is key in pandemic management.

Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment

Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment

The paper brings together the literature on citizen science and on deliberative democracy and epistemic injustice. 

Muting Science: Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Muting Science: Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid-19 Pandemic

This article explores why the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Parliament were reluctant to follow the majority views of the scientific epidemiological community at the beginning of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Perceptions and Behavior of Clinical Researchers and Research Support Staff Regarding Data FAIRification

Perceptions and Behavior of Clinical Researchers and Research Support Staff Regarding Data FAIRification

The FAIR Data Principles are being rapidly adopted by many research institutes and funders worldwide. This study assesses the awareness and attitudes of clinical researchers and research support staff regarding data FAIRification.

Leading Countries in Global Science Increasingly Receive More Citations Than Other Countries Doing Similar Research

Leading Countries in Global Science Increasingly Receive More Citations Than Other Countries Doing Similar Research

This article studies international citation and text similarity networks across 150 fields and find that some countries increasingly receive more citations despite researching similar topics as others.

The Rise of Sino-Russian Biotech Cooperation

The Rise of Sino-Russian Biotech Cooperation

Recent examples of Sino-Russian biotechnology cooperation projects, offering an early account of the emerging integration of two distinct innovation infrastructures.

On Staging Work: How Research Funding Bodies Create Adaptive Coherence in Times of Projectification

On Staging Work: How Research Funding Bodies Create Adaptive Coherence in Times of Projectification

The paper argues for the salience of more detailed empirical investigations into the work of funding bodies as they navigate tensions encountered by researchers.

Global Biodiversity is in Crisis, but How Bad is It? It's Complicated

Global Biodiversity is in Crisis, but How Bad is It? It's Complicated

While the planetary boundary framework provides one way of understanding biodiversity or biosphere integrity loss, there are many other measures of biodiversity loss — and all point toward the fact that we are continuing to dangerously destabilize life on Earth.

Gender Inequalities in Research Funding: Unequal Network Configurations, or Unequal Network Returns?

Gender Inequalities in Research Funding: Unequal Network Configurations, or Unequal Network Returns?

Despite longstanding discussions and consequent improvements of gender representation in academia, the number of women working in academic research, their performance and their recognition still indicate the persistence of gender inequalities.

Making the Most of World Talent for Science? The Nobel Prize and Fields Medal Experience - Scientometrics

Making the Most of World Talent for Science? The Nobel Prize and Fields Medal Experience - Scientometrics

This study found that the average age of scientists at the time of the breakthrough was higher for researchers from less developed countries. Moreover, individual opportunities in the world were extremely unequal by country of birth, gender significantly conditioned any participation in research, and the probability of becoming a top researcher more than doubled for individuals with parents belonging to the most favoured occupational categories. 

Designing Grant-Review Panels for Better Funding Decisions: Lessons from an Empirically Calibrated Simulation Model

Designing Grant-Review Panels for Better Funding Decisions: Lessons from an Empirically Calibrated Simulation Model

This article explores how factors relating to grades and grading affect the correctness of choices that grant-review panels make among submitted proposals. It seeks to identify interventions in panel design that may be expected to increase the correctness of choices.