Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation

Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation

Quantitative performance ratings are ubiquitous in modern organizations — from businesses to universities — yet there is substantialevidence of bias against women in suchratings. This study examines how gender inequalities in evaluations dependon the design of the tools used to judge merit. 

Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research

Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research

Whilst some scientists study insects, molecules, brains, or clouds, other scientists study science itself. Meta-research, or “research-on-research”, is a burgeoning discipline that investigates efficiency, quality, and bias in the scientific ecosystem.

Connecting fractured habitats has long-lasting ecological benefits

Connecting fractured habitats has long-lasting ecological benefits

A decades-long ecological experiment in South Carolina has shown the power of a straightforward way to improve wildlife habitats: connect them. Scientists say the study’s results, published Thursday in the journal Science, offer the most compelling evidence yet that connected habitats flourish for years.

Gender Pay Gap Persists

Gender Pay Gap Persists

Pay disparities between female and male PhD holders in the United States exist across almost all fields of science and engineering, according to a report from the US National Science Foundation (NSF).

Blame bad incentives for bad science

Blame bad incentives for bad science

These days, a scientist has to publish a steady stream of research articles to be “successful.” But two new studies argue that that kind of pressure promotes sloppy science at the expense of careful work.

 

Purposes of Peer Review: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Expectations and Perceptions

Purposes of Peer Review: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Expectations and Perceptions

Authors, editors and publishers differ in their understanding of and the value they attach to the purposes of peer review. 

CDC feels pressure from Trump as rift grows over coronavirus response

CDC feels pressure from Trump as rift grows over coronavirus response

An email to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was omnious: A senior adviser to a top Health and Human Services Department official accused the CDC of "untermining the president".

Trump Science Budget Sows Confusion

Trump Science Budget Sows Confusion

US president makes last-minute decision to abandon proposal for major cuts to National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation and Department of Energy’s science office.

2°C: Beyond the Limit

2°C: Beyond the Limit

New Jersey may seem an unlikely place to measure climate change, but it is one of the fastest-warming states in the nation. Its average temperature has climbed by close to 2 degrees Celsius since 1895 — double the average for the Lower 48 states.

White House Prepares to Scrutinize Intelligence Agencies’ Finding That Climate Change Threatens National Security

White House Prepares to Scrutinize Intelligence Agencies’ Finding That Climate Change Threatens National Security

The White House is working to assemble a panel to assess whether climate change poses a national security threat, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post, a conclusion that federal intelligence agencies have affirmed several times since President Trump took office.

A New Form of Stem-Cell Engineering Raises Ethical Questions

A New Form of Stem-Cell Engineering Raises Ethical Questions

Researchers at Harvard Medical School said it was time to ponder a startling new prospect: synthetic embryos.

Questionable and Open Research Practices in Education Research

Questionable and Open Research Practices in Education Research

Discussions of how to improve research quality are predominant in a number of fields, including education. But how prevalent are the use of problematic practices and the improved practices meant to counter them?

We’re Incentivizing Bad Science

We’re Incentivizing Bad Science

Current research trends resemble the early 21st century’s financial bubble. Let’s imagine what might happen if the rules of professional science evolved such that scientists were incentivized to publish as many papers as they could and if those who published many papers of poor scientific rigor were rewarded over those who published fewer papers of higher rigor? 

Teach Young Scientists the Importance of Societal Impact for Research

Teach Young Scientists the Importance of Societal Impact for Research

Societal impact should be rated more highly in scientific publishing and research evaluation. To this end, we suggest that ways to achieve it should be introduced as an important component of curricula at higher-education institutions.

My Look at Some Interesting Discovery Ideas, Trends and Features for Academic Search

My Look at Some Interesting Discovery Ideas, Trends and Features for Academic Search

What follows are a mix of technologies and actual search systems that I've been looking at that have potential to go beyond what current web scale or index based discovery offers. Some merely offer a new feature or two that might be incorporated fairly easily, others are based on fundamentally different frameworks and paradigms that supplement or might eventually replace current systems.

Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development

Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development

Completed revised second draft of a document that aims to agree on a broad, international strategy for the implementation of open scholarship that meets the needs of different national and regional communities but works globally.