Few Authors Choose Anonymous Peer Review
Massive study of Nature journals shows that scientists from developing countries and less prestigious institutes more often prefer reviewers to be blinded to their identity.
Send us a link
Massive study of Nature journals shows that scientists from developing countries and less prestigious institutes more often prefer reviewers to be blinded to their identity.
Early findings from across the geosciences will soon have not one, but two online servers ready to post preprints.
How long does that prejudice last?
Congratulations to Irene Hames, the winner of Publons' inaugural Sentinel Award - for outstanding advocacy, innovation or contribution to scholarly peer review.
The goal is to deliver an open-source submission and peer-review platform
Letter requests that ResearchGate consider removing content in violation of copyright.
American Geophysical Union places harassment, bullying, and discrimination on par with falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism.
Nowhere near enough new drugs are currently in development says a WHO report, which calls for urgent investment and responsible use of existing antibiotics.
Combining expertise from 21 labs in Europe and the US, the International Brain Laboratory will attempt to answer one of the greatest mysteries of all time.
A paper showing that science and engineering PhD students lose interest in an academic career over the course of graduate training.
More than half of those doing a doctorate in Switzerland come from abroad, according to the latest OECD education indicators.
As the h-index becomes the standard for measuring researcher impact, the risk for gaming the system grows.
President Donald Trump has nominated Walter Copan, an expert in technology transfer, to be the director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He says his top priority for the agency is to implement the Cybersecurity Framework.
Modelled on big physics projects, the International Brain Lab will bring together some of the world’s pre-eminent neuroscientists to probe a single behaviour.
Scientists hit back at a proposal to make it tougher to call findings statistically significant.
Peking University joins the top 20 of the Times Higher Education subject table for the first time
Trust that reviewers will treat manuscripts received for peer review as confidential communications is an essential tenet of peer review. New results suggest that breaches of this trust do occur.
Workshop on a growing threat to Europe's biodiversity and the role of Citizen Science and Open Data as a model.
Scientists from around the globe gathered for annual ceremony celebrating research that ‘first makes you laugh, then makes you think’.
Here's a brief summary of some key takeaways from this year's Peer Review Congress, held every four years. A talk by the Swiss National Science Foundation was especially enjoyed.
Transparency in Review, and other innovations - Research in progress blog
Hypothesis and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory are today announcing the selection of the Hypothesis open source annotation framework for the bioRxiv preprint service as their primary annotation mechanism.
Instead of making scientists compete for grants based on project proposals, research funding could simply be divided equally among all ‘qualified’ researchers, according to a new paper.
Once every 4 years editors, publishers, and meta-researchers assemble in Chicago for the Peer Review Congress - an intense researchfest about "enhancing the quality and credibility of science".