Head of Ancient-DNA Lab Sacked for ‘serious Misconduct’
Alan Cooper was dismissed as the leader of a prestigious genomics centre, following an investigation.
Send us a link
Alan Cooper was dismissed as the leader of a prestigious genomics centre, following an investigation.
World's second-biggest publisher says proposals to accelerate switch to open access would not be sustainable for many titles
An analysis of submissions to two top journals showed that scientists in the U.S. were highly likely to be working during holidays.
The 2010s have seen breakthroughs in frontiers from gene editing to gravitational waves. The coming one must focus on climate change.
Articles in high-impact journals are by definition more highly cited on average. But are they cited more often because the articles are somehow "better"? Or are they cited more often simply because they appeared in a high-impact journal?
Navigating the turbulent waters of the doctoral voyage
Letters blast rumored shift to immediate open access for taxpayer-funded studies
Robert Harington explores rumors circulating in recent weeks of an impending US Executive Order focusing on public access to federally funded research and open data.
Many scientific organizations struggle with teaching and incentivizing science-communication practices. Here's what they can do differently, says communication researcher Jessica Eise.
The findings mark a step forward in using space technology to detect leaks of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from oil and gas sites worldwide.
NIH gets 7%, NSF only 2.5%, as Congress ignores Trump's proposed cuts.
Altmetric list of scholarship getting the most online attention shows that authenticity in science, and society more generally, is major theme of the year.
An opportunity for journals and publishers to take the bold step of changing their business model?
Do men and women differ in how positively they frame their research findings and is the positive framing of research is associated with higher downstream citations?
Ten people who mattered in science in 2019 according to nature.
The research that caught the public imagination in 2019.
American pigs are raised on a liberal diet of antibiotics, fueling the rise of resistant germs. Danish pork producers are proving there's a better way.
Exhausted delegates postponed tricky issues. The weak rules on a market based mechanism, promoted by Brazil and Australia, that would have undermined efforts to reduce emissions have been shelved and the fight can continue next year at COP26 in Glasgow.
Economic and Social Research Council may provide four years of PhD funding amid concerns over stress caused by three-year model
Scientists use big data to understand what separates winners from losers
How will climate change shape the Earth's surface? What are the long-term health effects of food additives? How can online tools change political advocacy and what does this mean for democracy? These are just some of the questions that researchers from around Europe have proposed to explore, and will now be able to, thanks to newly-awarded EU funding.
Agreement allows yearlong delay before papers become free to read.
Promises to raise research spending and take action on climate change overshadowed by scientists' fears about leaving the European Union.
Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach.
In this post, Mark Hahnel presents findings from the largest continuous survey of academic attitudes to open data and suggests that as well promoting data sharing, it may also have inadvertently fed into the publish or perish culture of research.
Researchers of color are particularly vulnerable to "unprofessional" comments.
Academics can excel in many areas, but thus far they have primarily been assessed based on research achievements. From now on, the public knowledge institutions and research funders want to consider academics' knowledge and expertise more broadly in determining career policy and grant requirements.
The Psychological Science Accelerator isn't the only project seeking to address the reproducibility problem. But the accelerator is unique in two ways. First, collaborators plan to continue to work on large-scale efforts indefinitely. And second, the accelerator isn't necessarily limited to replication studies, opening it to novel and exploratory work.