Subscribe to the
weekly newsletter

Editors of Major Political Science Journals Demonstrate No Systematic Bias Against Female Authors

14.06.2018

Introducing Metadata for Peer Review

06.06.2018

Signing My Peer Review - Unintended Consequences and Gender

06.06.2018

No Race or Gender Bias in a Randomized Experiment of NIH R01 Grant Reviews

01.06.2018

What Motivates Reviewers? An Experiment in Economics

31.05.2018

Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review

28.05.2018

When Will Peer Reviewers Finally Get Paid?

23.05.2018

We Must Demand Evidence of Peer Review

21.05.2018

Beyond Impact Factors: An Academy of Management Report on Measuring Scholarly Impact

17.05.2018

Evidence of Gender Bias Found in Peer Review

01.05.2018

Advocating for Publishing Peer Review

30.04.2018

Peer Review: Correspondence by Relationship at the Royal Society

19.04.2018

Open Peer Review: Bringing Transparency, Accountability, and Inclusivity to the Peer Review Process

17.04.2018

The More Revisions a Paper Undergoes, the Greater Its Subsequent Recognition in Terms of Citations

11.04.2018

#PressForProgress in Peer Review

11.04.2018

Writing a Peer Review Is a Structured Process That Can Be Learned and Improved

05.04.2018

NIH Moves to Punish Researchers who Violate Confidentiality

29.03.2018

8 Simple Mistakes That Can Delay Peer Review (and How to Avoid Them)

16.03.2018

Peer Review Fails to Prevent Publication of Paper with Unsupported Claims About Peer Review

15.03.2018

A Curious Blindness Among Peer Review Initiatives

07.03.2018
Subscribe to News