Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

ALLEA Publishes Revised Edition of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity

ALLEA Publishes Revised Edition of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity

The revised Code addresses recent and emerging challenges emanating from technological developments, open science, citizen science and social media, among other areas.

'Fake Research' Comes Under Scrutiny

'Fake Research' Comes Under Scrutiny

The scale of "fake research" in the UK appears to have been underestimated, a BBC investigation suggests.

A Scholarly Sting Operation Shines a Light on ‘Predatory’ Journals

A Scholarly Sting Operation Shines a Light on ‘Predatory’ Journals

When Dr. Fraud applied to 360 randomly selected open-access academic journals asking to be an editor, 48 accepted her and four made her editor in chief. 

7 Bad Science and Health Ideas That Should Die With 2016

7 Bad Science and Health Ideas That Should Die With 2016

There’s no shortage of misinformation in the world — particularly around health and science topics.

PubPeer Wins Closely Watched Legal Battle Over Anonymous Comments

PubPeer Wins Closely Watched Legal Battle Over Anonymous Comments

A Michigan appeals court has handed PubPeer a key win in its legal battle with a researcher who claims the site cost him a job and sullied his reputation.

Infographics on Research Integrity

Infographics on Research Integrity

The Office of Research Integrity shares a series of infographics addressing the Responsible Conduct of Research and the handling of research misconduct.

Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

Researchers acting to maximise their fitness should spend most of their effort seeking novel results and conduct small studies that have only 10%–40% statistical power. As a result, half of the studies they publish will report erroneous conclusions. Current incentive structures are in conflict with maximising the scientific value of research; we suggest ways that the scientific ecosystem could be improved.

Blame bad incentives for bad science

Blame bad incentives for bad science

These days, a scientist has to publish a steady stream of research articles to be “successful.” But two new studies argue that that kind of pressure promotes sloppy science at the expense of careful work.

 

Mass production of review articles is cause for concern

Mass production of review articles is cause for concern

A torrent of low-quality meta-analyses and systematic reviews in biomedicine might be hiding valuable research and misleading scientists.