Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016

Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016

Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall, January 5, 2016. Each year at this time I formally release my updated list of predatory publishers. Because the list is now very la…

The NASW and the Looming Rift in Science Journalism

The NASW and the Looming Rift in Science Journalism

A report suggests that internal discord may tear apart the National Association of Science Writers, a near century-old professional journalism organization.

Sci-Hub: What It Is and Why It Matters

Sci-Hub: What It Is and Why It Matters

The controversies surrounding Sci-Hub touch on many hot-button topics in librarianship. This primer lays out multiple perspectives on the issues.

The Economics of Academic Self-promotion

The Economics of Academic Self-promotion

Marketing is you telling others about yourself. Public relations is having someone else tell others about you.

Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors.

Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors.

A series of studies across countries and disciplines in higher education confirm that student evaluations of teaching (SET) are significantly correlated with instructor gender, with students regularly rating female instructors lower than male peers.

A peerless review? Automating methodological and statistical review

A peerless review? Automating methodological and statistical review

Peer review is the primary mechanism for ensuring the integrity of the published literature; however, it is a human system with all of a human's fallibilities. Here Daniel Shanahan asks whether we could use text mining to automate some aspects of the peer review process to address some of its limitations, and introduces a new pilot to evaluate the software.

Yes, I think academic publishers are greedy

Yes, I think academic publishers are greedy

Another day, another puff-piece from academic publishers about how awesome they are. This time, the Publisher’s Association somehow suckered the Guardian into giving them a credible-looking p…

Unravelling the true cost of publishing in open access

Unravelling the true cost of publishing in open access

Universities must continue to monitor and track the variety of associated spending related to journal publishing and access, argues Lorraine Estelle. Many universities are forecasting that their AP…

Google launches Science Journal to turn your phone into a research lab

Google launches Science Journal to turn your phone into a research lab

Google believes there's a scientist in all of us, so it's launching a new app that turns your phone into a powerful little research lab.

On the productivity of scientists

On the productivity of scientists

Ever since Reagan and Thatcher made neoliberal ideas palatable to an unsuspecting public, concepts such as “New Public Management” or the more general notion that competition between in…

DOAJ to remove approximately 3300 journals

DOAJ to remove approximately 3300 journals

Today the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) will remove approximately 3300 journals for failure to submit a valid reapplication before the communicated deadline.

Are we seeing the rise of the Trump Academic?

Are we seeing the rise of the Trump Academic?

We can all recognise the ambitious researcher at the conference who is anxious to advertise their own work while affecting interest in the keynote speaker’s presentation. It resonates with my current work on academic self-promotion via university profile pages. And I start to wonder, is a new academic habitus is beginning to emerge?

Philanthropies Announce Program to Develop Scientific Talent Worldwide

Philanthropies Announce Program to Develop Scientific Talent Worldwide

HHMI, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation announce the International Research Scholars Program which aims to support up to 50 outstanding early career scientists worldwide.

Economic thoughts about “gold” open access

Economic thoughts about “gold” open access

There is increasing support in the scholarly communications community for “flipping” the standard journal publishing model from subscription-based to “gold” open access...

Yet more evidence for questionable research practices in Psychology

Yet more evidence for questionable research practices in Psychology

The replicability of psychological research is surprisingly low. Why? In this blog post I present new evidence showing that questionable research practices contributed to failures to replicate psyc…

Publication bias is boring. You should care about it anyway.

Publication bias is boring. You should care about it anyway.

You all know about publication bias, don't you? Sure you do. It's the tendency to publish research that has bold, affirmative results and ignore research that concludes there's nothing going on.

Revolutionizing research communication through a new academic publishing platform

Revolutionizing research communication through a new academic publishing platform

The way that researchers communicate their work has not changed significantly in the last few centuries; academic publishing still relies on journal articles an…