Michele Marchetto of Wikimedia Italia shares the story of how they helped authors to make their open access articles more widely available.

The opportunities and experiences of blogging as part of teaching.

The Case of the EPA, John Konkus, and Climate Change.

Maybe there isn't a peer-review 'crisis,' at least in terms of quantity.

The author line provides no adequate information on the qualitative contribution of the single persons listed.

In analyzing the marketplace of scholarly publishers and scientific workflow providers, a key strategic question is: Who owns Digital Science?

Two scientists set out to animate how sperm moves. They ended up making a major discovery.

Last week's Transforming Research conference in Baltimore, MD, gathered a range of speakers across the academic and professional spectrum.

How many scientists does it take to change the world?

Canadian Science Publishing's Mary Seligy provides a primer on standards, XML and JATS4R, which is driving improved reusability of scholarly content.

100+ volunteers sharing their knowledge about Open Science and contributing to what they see as an extremely important issue in nowadays and future science.

Taxpayers sometimes have to pay three times for any scientific article. 

If you’re a researcher writing software, this guide will show you how to make the work you share on GitHub citable.

Global comparisons of previous social and economic upheavals suggest that what is to come depends on where you are now, argues Robert C. Allen.

Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.

A new study highlights the variety of productivity trajectories among faculty members in computer science.

Philanthropy’s no replacement for crucial government science funding, but that message can get lost amid the high-profile gifts. Some science funders are now backing a push to protect federal funding.

A "completely confusing statement" in a gazette notification has scientists wondering which of their papers will and won't be considered towards their promotions in the future.

Everybody talks about Blockchain these days, but why should we consider this technology when thinking about Open Scholarship?

My PhD thesis research was a dead end, but that’s why it was important.

Unsurprisingly, many — if not most — scientists aren’t great at science communication.

AI is only loosely modeled on the brain. So what if you wanted to do it right? You’d need to do what has been impossible until now: map what actually happens in neurons and nerve fibers.

Opening up science so that all stages of the process can benefit from better interaction and communication and to provide examples for early career scientists writing grants.

Looking at some of the issues around the reuse of scientific data and open a conversation about how to deal with them.

Publons new Review Distribution Index reveals that a small proportion of reviewers do the lion's share of the peer review.

Biologists are posting unreviewed papers in record numbers. Here's a survival guide.

British researchers funded under Horizon 2020 will lose their grants if the UK stops allowing freedom of movement at any point during the length of their projects.

A call on research organizations and their libraries to secure and earmark a share of their acquisition budgets to support the development of scientific publishing activities.

EMBL-EBI’s open chemistry data services combine curiosity-driven science and pragmatic solution-finding for drug discovery.

ResearchGate and Springer Nature have been in serious discussions for some time about finding solutions to sharing scientific journal articles online, while at the same time protecting intellectual property rights.