When one of the first online science journals went under, its papers all disappeared. Enter: Portico, the Wayback Machine for scholarly publications.

Facebook has recently announced a substantial tightening of access restrictions to the APIs of Facebook, Instagram, and other platforms it owns. While these changes may generate some positive publicity for the company, they are likely to compound the real problem, further diminishing transparency and opportunities for independent oversight.

The Swiss universities are negotiating with the world’s three largest scientific publishers for fair – in other words affordable – terms of access. Michael Hengartner, president of swissuniversities and UZH, explains the background.

A blockchain platform and tokenised economy to promote, facilitate, and incentivise the practice of open science.

A petition to make gender equality an integral part of the European strategy for research and innovation during the negotiation of the research Framework Programme 9.

By making science readily available to any viewer, researchers can reach people who are interested in science but can’t read original manuscripts in a journal for whatever reason. If you don’t believe me, just ask my mum.

There are many ways to address science policy topics and your group may find some original ways to address them. Here are some common approaches student groups use to address issues.

It’s time for scholars to ask whether today’s data preservation technologies align with open scholarship’s values of access, preservation, privacy, and transparency.

The latest developments in science policy, hands-on examples from scientific communities as well as current developments in FAIR Data in the field of research data management. This is what was on offer at the Open Science Conference from 13 to 14 March 2018 in Berlin.

Three examples for library engagement in trust: scholarly communication literacy, information quality and legal certainty.

A revolution in college course materials is raising questions about cost, access, and fairness. Publishers say their high-tech courseware - electronic books glowing with videos and interactive study guides - can improve the quality of learning at a small fraction of the cost of traditional textbooks. But student advocates call for adoption of open-source textbooks that can be downloaded for free and worry that the same companies that drove up the price of print textbooks are dominating the digital space and will ultimately introduce higher costs there.

Why Jupyter succeed where Mathematica failed? The obvious contrast is between the proprietary world of Wolfram and the open-source model of the software ecosystem that Jupyter mobilizes.

Questionable research practices are not fraud, and they're not cause for panic. But they do give us some hints about how we can make science more robust.

Network tracks the evolution of microbial communities in sourdough starter mixtures shared around the world.

With our society becoming increasingly dependent on technology and STEM literacy, it’s becoming even more imperative to close the drastic gender gap that exists within STEM fields.

A researcher explains how - and why - he spent a whole summer harvesting information from the platform, which is notoriously hard to mine.

Even when the field of academic study is removed from the equation, women’s earnings still trail those of men by 11 percent. The reason? Family. Married women with children are paid less than those who don’t have similarly structured families. Meanwhile, men earn the same amount, regardless of their marital or parental status. 

When someone has to retract a paper for misconduct, what are the odds they will do it again? And how can we use that information to stop repeat offenders?

Big technology companies seem to be waging a war on humankind’s long-standing intellectual tradition, according to author Franklin Foer, who shows us how to fight back.

"If you [only] have products created by white guys in their 20s, you’re gonna miss the mark."

Preparing early career scientists for a career that connects science and society.

Understanding the provenance of information used by Wikipedians, also allows us to lift a veil on its gaps - the types of sources, languages, and perspectives - that are not represented, which in turn can inform community efforts to improve coverage in underserved content areas.

After leaving the lab, these three scientists decided they wanted to go back and made it happen.

Firsthand account about the experience of racism in scholarly publishing, showing we have "a great deal of powerful and humbling work to do" to address racism and the white-dominated culture of our industry.

Elsevier, a major scientific publisher, has a 36 percent profit margin - bigger than Apple, Amazon, and Google. And it's just one of many. But Sci-Hub could change all that by releasing every article for free.

It helps to choose the right scholarly meeting and to swallow your discomfort with schmoozing.

12 steps, relevant to both first-time peer reviewers and those keen to brush up on their skills.

The difference between full counting and fractional counting of publiations should inform our interpretation of the headlines.

Scholars love to hate the journal impact factor, but how flawed is it?

A group of fourteen authors came together in February 2018 at the TIB (German National Library of Science and Technology) in Hannover to create an open, living handbook on Open Science training.