Not only are scientific articles that have strong coverage in social media likely to be cited more in the future, social media is also the tool that allows us to communicate directly with the general public.

What we're learning, and why it matters.

It has taken a while, but the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences (SAAS) have come out with a valuable booklet on authorships of scientific manuscripts. This recommendations, published now also as a special article in the Swiss Medical Weekly, aspire to serve as a practical guide for principal investigators confronted with the task of assigning authorships to the individuals contributing to scientific manuscripts.

Scholarly articles are distributed almost exclusively in digital form. While there is an increasing number of journal articles freely available via green or gold open access, the majority of them still can only be read if the reader works at an institution with a subscription to the journal..

Last spring, the four of us published an essay in PNAS in which we described the severe problems now faced by scientists working in the US biomedical research system, recommending several steps that might be taken to improve the situation...

Why only 2 of 43 young scientists receiving the prestigious University Research Fellowships in the UK were women.

The cooperation will expose to Altmetric the metadata of all the Paperity articles for proper identification. In return, Altmetric will track social mentions of these articles and measure online attention they receive, with calculation of Altmetric score.

We propose steps to help increase the transparency of the scientific method and the reproducibility of research results.

In April 2014, four leaders of the scientific establishment issued

"I never quit until I get what I'm after. Negative results are just what I'm after. They are just as valuable to me as positive results." - Thomas A. Edison.

The final act in a long-running saga should bring tighter controls on unproven therapies, both at home and abroad.

Oliver Sacks on Learning He Has Terminal Cancer.

The Institute of Medicine takes a step in the right direction but we should move even faster.

Real scientific controversies are self-correcting shows the BICEP2 and Planck example.

An interview with John Ioannidis, co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford.

Professors issue warning over obsession with performance management and research excellence.

Corruption is a barrier to innovation. Greater scrutiny of public spending is needed if science and technology are to fulfil their potential.

A startup accelerator called "Scholas.Labs" was announced during an education event hosted by Pope Francis.

A survey finds that 87% of scientists agree with the statement “Scientists should take an active role in public policy debates about issues related to science and technology.

Analysis of millions of papers finds that junior biomedical researchers tend to work on more innovative topics than their senior colleagues do.

[GGpErwgGTcmi8gdt1A7o_altmetric_circle_medium_400x400.png]

d[3]ouble-blind review [niWsUluYRUOIzRCEqHYY_nature-header.ed_400x400.png]

A new JAMA study found the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is silent on matters of scientific misconduct and fraud.

The European Commission says its outside experts have agreed there must be more integration, better infrastructure and an emphasis on concrete results.

Male professors are brilliant, awesome and knowledgeable. Women are bossy and annoying, and beautiful or ugly. These are a few of the results from a new interactive chart that was gaining notice on social media.

NIH's proposal-an "emeritus" award that senior scientists would use to pass their work on to younger colleagues and wind down their labs is being blasted in the blogosphere.

A new computer simulation explores just how sensitive the process might be to bias and randomness. Its answer: very.

Why the Norwegian Research Council is taking a stand against hybrid Open Access journals.

Surveys find broad support for government to spend money on science, but that doesn’t mean the public supports the conclusions that scientists draw.

White House plan would increase research and development funding but faces rough road in Congress.