Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Science, Peer Review, Open Access and Controversy

Science, Peer Review, Open Access and Controversy

Following Nature's Future of Publishing special issue this spring, Science has just published a similar series of articles. Needless to say, there is a definite ideological bent to the articles included in both and more misleading information about open access.

Scientists' public engagement work should be generously funded

Scientists' public engagement work should be generously funded

Public engagement should be an integral part of research, not an unpaid hobby, which is why the Wellcome Trust has decided to invest £4.5m a year in it.

Research evaluation: Impact

Research evaluation: Impact

Every organization that funds research wants to support science that makes a difference. But there is no simple formula for identifying truly important research. And the job is becoming more difficult.

The maze of impact metrics

The maze of impact metrics

So much science, so little time. Amid an ever-increasing mountain of research articles, data sets and other output, hard-pressed research funders and employers need shortcuts to identify and reward the work that matters.

The future of scientific peer review (conference videos)

The future of scientific peer review (conference videos)

Discussion about open-access publishing and the future of scientific communication and peer-review at the Open Science Summit 2012.

Golden Goose awards announced for obscure science

Golden Goose awards announced for obscure science

The Golden Goose Award officially recognizes scientists in the U.S., whose federally funded basic research has led to innovations or inventions which have a significant impact on humanity or society.

Listen as Albert Einstein reads 'The Common Language of Science'

Listen as Albert Einstein reads 'The Common Language of Science'

Here's an extraordinary recording of Albert Einstein from the fall of 1941, reading a full-length essay in English.

Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study

Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study

At the International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, efforts to explore the scientific literature have shifted away from peer review and into other areas, such as bias and authorship. With a dearth of available data and funding, large systematic studies of how peer review works and doesn't aren't easy to get off the ground.

Aktuelle Forschung bleibt hinter Paywall

Aktuelle Forschung bleibt hinter Paywall

Kurz vor der Wahl hat der Bundesrat ein Gesetz durchgewunken, das wissenschaftlichen Urhebern mehr Rechte einräumt. Weder Forscher noch Verlage sind zufrieden damit.

A win for German science?

A win for German science?

The just-elected parliament will face several key decisions on research funding, which will have far-reaching consequences for German scientists. Several big funding programs run out between 2015 and 2019, and the next government will shape their replacements. There is broad support across parties, however, for continuing the programs in some form.

Sao Paulo's success story

Sao Paulo's success story

The success of Sao Paulo's way of funding science has made it a model throughout Brazil: Sao Paulo produces 50 per cent of Brazilian science through FAPESP which receives one per cent of state tax revenue. The model allows for long-term planning and other states are now emulating it.

Arbeitslose Akademiker: Topfschlagen im Niemandsland

Arbeitslose Akademiker: Topfschlagen im Niemandsland

Leiharbeiter mit Staatsexamen, Ingenieure in der Spülküche: Selbst Akademiker können arbeitslos werden - und zwar schneller, als sie ahnen. Wer einmal gezwungen ist, sich unter seiner Qualifikation zu verkaufen, sitzt in der Falle.

Why is science behind a paywall?

Why is science behind a paywall?

Scientists' work follows a consistent pattern. They apply for grants, perform their research, and publish the results in a journal. The process is so routine it almost seems inevitable. But what if it's not the best way to do science?

Navigating Collaborative Grant Research

Navigating Collaborative Grant Research

Marie and Pierre Curie, Watson and Crick, Brin and Page. Collaboration pays, so funding agencies are promoting team research. At the same time, fields that demand multidisciplinary cooperation such as translational medicine, climate science, and systems biology are on the rise.

Why You DON'T "Fucking Love Science"

Why You DON'T "Fucking Love Science"

So you think you love science, do you? What does that mean to you, exactly? For most people, I'm guessing it means something like data, and like countless "Principal Investigators" of the science world, you're confusing data with science.

Five tips for crowdfunding success

Five tips for crowdfunding success

With only one in five National Health and Medical Research Council ( NHMRC) grant applications successful, and a similar rate for Australian Research Council ( ARC) Discovery grants, it's little wonder researchers are looking to alternate forms of funding - one of which being crowdfunding.

'Beer goggle' study wins Ig Nobel

'Beer goggle' study wins Ig Nobel

A team of researchers who found that people think they are more attractive when drinking alcohol, have scooped an Ig Nobel prize for their work. The researchers from France and the US confirmed the "beer goggle effect" also works on oneself.