The 10 Most Badass Scientific Collaborations That Have Ever Happened
How many scientists does it take to change the world?
Send us a link
How many scientists does it take to change the world?
Teaching scientists foundational computing skills.
Patreon works differently to most other crowdfunding services. On Patreon, you donate a small amount regularly.
Young firms struggle to compete as deep-pocketed companies like Facebook and Amazon clone products and consolidate their power.
Two scientists set out to animate how sperm moves. They ended up making a major discovery.
100+ volunteers sharing their knowledge about Open Science and contributing to what they see as an extremely important issue in nowadays and future science.
Imagine a connected online web of scientific knowledge… tightly integrated with a scientific social web that directs scientists’ attention where it is most valuable, releasing enormous collaborative potential.
Taxpayers sometimes have to pay three times for any scientific article.
80% of faculty exhibit a rich diversity of productivity patterns.
Accounting for audience gender ratio, men asked 1.8 questions for each question asked by a woman.
Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.
Why Greek and Latin medical terminology is better off dead.
Global comparisons of previous social and economic upheavals suggest that what is to come depends on where you are now, argues Robert C. Allen.
If you’re a researcher writing software, this guide will show you how to make the work you share on GitHub citable.
A European Commission working group recommends Horizon 2020 evaluation process to account for gender issues.
Brian C. Martinson imagines how rationing the number of publications a scientist could put out might improve the scientific literature.
Last week's Transforming Research conference in Baltimore, MD, gathered a range of speakers across the academic and professional spectrum.
Artificial-intelligence program AlphaGo Zero trained in just days, without any human input.
Increased provision of information in accessible repositories appears to be a cost-effective way to advance science. Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial.
In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers are on arXiv.
SpringerNature, the publisher of science magazines Nature and Scientific American, is preparing a 2018 stock market listing valuing the company at up to 4 billion euros.
An open document that tries to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Science movement currently stands.
A new study highlights the variety of productivity trajectories among faculty members in computer science.