A critical view of altmetrics
Altmetrics is one of the hotly debated topics in the Open Science movement today.
Send us a link
Altmetrics is one of the hotly debated topics in the Open Science movement today.
This editorial describes the problems with the process of preparing and publishing research findings, and with judging their veracity and significance, and then explains how we at Faculty of 1000 are starting to tackle the ‘deadly sins’ of science publishing.
Studying researchers’ CVs shows that moving jobs does not always boost a researcher’s productivity.
The publication, retraction and subsequent republication of the Séralini study raise important scientific and ethical issues for journal editors. Decisions to retract an article should be made on the basis of well-established policies. Articles should be retracted only for serious errors that undermine the reliability of the data or results, or for serious ethical lapses, such as research misconduct or mistreatment of animal or human subjects.
President Juncker welcomes world-leading scientists, discusses role of science in competitiveness and announces new mechanism for scientific advice.
Researchers Reject Nature’s Fast Track Peer Review Experiment.
[5]Royal Society Open Science aims to tackle the biases in traditional formats.
[8]F1000Workspace offers scientists a comprehensive suite of software and services to write and collaborate on papers, annotate and share references and articles, as well as easily discover and save relevant new articles.
An ambitious [11]effort to replicate 100 research findings in psychology ended last week - and the data look worrying.
Computer scientists are trying to shore up broken links in the scholarly literature.
Intense lobbying by scientists and journal publishing companies between now and the autumn is expected.
in 2012 a new law ordered French public employers to offer stable employment to workers after 6 years of short-term contracts. It backfired.
The surprising power of the psychology of consensus.
In academia, strong hierarchies and nepotism compound problems associated with biases.
[24]This report presents the key findings, the main areas of discussion and the policy recommendations emerging from the consultation.
Understanding emerging areas of a multidisciplinary research field is crucial for researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders. For them a knowledge structure based on longitudinal bibliographic data can be an effective instrument.
Scientists receive much advice on how to write an effective paper that their colleagues will read, cite, and celebrate. Here we put this advice to the test, and measure the impact of certain features of academic writing on success, as proxied by citations.
Special Issue on reproducibility in EuroScientist.
It’s widely recognised that the established scholarly publishers skim an awful lot of money off the top of research budgets.
You're in your 60s. Should you stay in the lab, or make way for the next generation?
Science 2.0 is a new approach to science that uses information-sharing and collaboration made possible by network technologies. This consultation gathers the opinions of a broad sample of interested parties from across the EU research landscape.
The Max Planck Digital Library has put forward a study on the transformation of the subscription-driven system for scientific publications to an Open Access model. For the first time, quantitative parameters are presented showing that the liberation of scholarly literature is possible at no extra costs..
The fall out from the STAP case is still being felt across Japan.
A peer reviewer's suggestion that two female researchers find "one or two male biologists" to co-author and help them strengthen a manuscript they had written and submitted to a journal has unleashed an avalanche of disbelief and disgust on Twitter today.
A crowdfunding campaign for a brain imaging study closed Monday after raising almost $80,000 toward a unique goal: the first functional magnetic resonance images of the brain on LSD.
Ridding science of shoddy statistics will require scrutiny of every step, not merely the last one.
There’s no doubt political parties listen to think tanks. Using them to present academic work could help researchers penetrate the Westminster bubble.
This paper makes the strong, fact-based case for a large-scale transformation of the current corpus of scientific subscription journals to an open access business model.
This collection brings together agenda-setting essays by policymakers, practitioners, scientists and scholars from across Europe.