Jump to navigation
Enter the article’s url One of our curators will take care of it as soon as possible!
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Unsurprisingly, many — if not most — scientists aren’t great at science communication.
Bad research just doesn’t affect the people in the area around it, the people who might spend years trying to take a dodgy result and extend it.
After almost two decades, these developments give hope that scholarly articles will finally be freed from their paywalls.
How and why we should get rid of author lists in scientific publications.
We-Sci: a collaborative research network for computational and traditional biologists.
A novel text-mining strategy that identifies articles producing biological data.
Parallels in science denialism: Soviet Union led by Stalin and US government led by Trump.
Everything one can do other than be professor.
After a post-election frenzy to save government data, open-access advocates are refocusing their energies toward a long-term strategy.
Data labs, and the scant motivations for sharing data in basic science.
I doubt that twitter has made my academic papers directly more impactful, but does that stop me tweeting about my group’s work? No way.
How your doctor was bought.
In the quest to make scientific publications free to read and free to publish, the million-dollar question is: how can it be sustainable?
F1000 is reducing the open access publishing charges for all articles containing an interactive Plotly figure by 50%.
From an audio version of a peer-reviewed journal to 60-second crash courses, these are the best science podcasts.
WikiTribune has been awarded €385,000 by the Digital News Initiative fund.
1. Write for the intended audience.
Linked Open Data may sound good and noble, but it’s the wrong way around.
The best idea humans have ever had.
Journal publishing can no longer keep up with the pace of scientific research.